cavendish

Plan alignment · FY27

The plan, and what stands behind it.

Every objective in All in on AI — strategy execution plan, with the research standing behind it and the evidence tier that research has actually reached. The gap is the half worth reading: an objective with nothing behind it is not a failure of the lab, it is a question about whether anybody has asked.

Evidence behind the plan · 30 objectives

30% have research behind them · 23% something tested
7 tested 2 research, untested 2 lab in the room 19 nothing behind them
Research behind them
0/30

7 have something tested

Nothing behind them
0

2 more have the lab in the room

Milestones inside 90 days
0

what the lab has to be useful by

Still on the old plan
0

the lab is working that queue

Every objective with the research standing behind it and the evidence tier that research reached.

9 of 30 objectives have research aligned to them and 7 have something tested; 2 more have no research but do have the lab in the room. Those are different answers and were being given the same one. The remaining gap is the useful half: an objective with nothing behind it is not a failure of the lab, it is a question about whether anybody has asked. 35 alignments are still pointing at the superseded plan and are not counted here — the lab is working that queue.

Pillar 1

Transform how every team works with AI

Pillar 2

Turn AI partnerships into commercial engines

Pillar 3

Build world-class agentic and AI solutions

Pillar 4

Defend and deepen our data moats

Pillar 5

Win in AI transformation

Enabler A

Back the right bets and stop the rest

Enabler B

A team and culture that raises everyone’s game

Enabler C

Strengthen our technical foundations