What happens when this meets that?

Pick the fields, say how you want the thinking pointed, and the system drafts a typed hypothesis with a kill condition and a proposed run. The most genuinely augmented interaction in the system: you supply the intuition, the agent supplies the legwork, and you argue with the fields rather than with a chat window — steering by conversation produces a fluent paragraph nobody can falsify. Most joins are wrong, which is why what comes out is a hypothesis at signal tier rather than a recommendation.

What are you putting together?

one field or several · a join is a claim about two, so three fields make three joins

How do you want the thinking pointed?The half a machine cannot supply. Without it this is the graph talking to itself.

Most joins are wrong. What comes out is a typed hypothesis and a proposed run at signal tier — never a recommendation, and never a paragraph you cannot argue with.

Or build it on the canvas